The Brunch Table

12/26/2006

The death of the newsstand and the decline in magazine editorial quality

Filed under: — Joe @ 9:53 am

I found this comment by Jerry Johnson buried in all the squabbles on James Howard Kunstler’s doomsaying blog:

Playboy itself, in my view, went down once they embraced forced circulation. In the days when it was very relevant, 80% of the circulation was newsstand. That is readers consciously chose to buy it each month: they were interested in what was presented. This was exceedingly important to advertisers because they knew their message would be read by someone timely interested. Today, barely 10% of the circulation is newsstand. The culprit has been the fundy attacks on local newssstands. They barely exist anymore compared to forty years ago. Who buy’s it? Basically long time readers. It has been overtaken by senility yet still has the same class it always had. Hef refuses to compromise with reader value.

Editors lead their audience. This was the story behind all the major mass market magazines with a message. That ended with the advent of formats like People Magazine. So today, we have mostly specialty magazines like Classic Toy Trains. Hef was the last great editor. Even great newsspaper editors are gone.

Subscriptions killed the magazine as an important information venue. You are muzzled because leading your audience does not increase circulation. It takes the newsstand to get the leadership to generate increased circulation. On the other hand, you only lose circulation via subscriptions because you piss off some percentage every time you take a stance. There are now so few newsstands that critical mass can no longer be generated. You will buy one issue for a hot subject. The same is not true for a subscription.

So, we are stuck with TV and radio.

…well, and my employer’s line of work, relevant internet advertising. I thought it was interesting because I hadn’t thought much about how magazine advertising related to distribution patterns before. Certainly, most of my magazine reading in recent years happened because I got a ridiculously cheap subscription through something like a frequent flyer point offer—and at those prices, you don’t really care if you let them pile up on the coffee table.

Thinking back, I probably did most of my magazine reading in my youth, leafing through the pages of GamePro and Electronic Gaming Monthly in Waldenbooks while my mom did her mall shopping. That seems to be a pretty hopeless segment of the magazine sector these days, where the the internet is now more timely and richer (you can now get HD clips of game footage for free online instead of squinting at screenshots on paper). From what I’ve seen, Ziff Davis Media is doing a good job of developing a portfolio of experiments around their 1up brand, particularly in developing a cult of personality around their writers through blogs and podcasts. When up-to-the-minute raw news is everywhere, commentary from trusted names is a more valuable commodity.

These days, magazines seem best suited for cases where the paper format is really more handy (airplane trips, beauty parlors, reading in bed), and where the content isn’t particularly time-sensitive. O’Reilly has taken the latter in an extreme direction, treating Make magazine like a collectable series of books—you can still buy the first issue new on Amazon.

In any case, Jerry Johnson’s thesis about newsstands is interesting (and credible, since he worked in circulation). While he blames “fundies” for the death of the newsstand, I wonder how much of a role suburbanization played—the withering of walkable areas meant that more people were going to supermarkets (and eventually Wal-Mart) for their magazines, which certainly created larger targets for puritanical pressure. (And since magazines are probably a minor revenue stream for grocery stores, it’s not worth their time and space to have an employee controlling access to more risqué or edgier titles, like you have with newsstands.)

I wonder how different the situation is in Europe? At least in the larger cities, I’ve still seen quite a few newsstands on the sidewalks there.

12/25/2006

RiffTrax: MST3K Lives!

Filed under: — Joe @ 12:34 am

A few Mystery Science Theater 3000 alums have finally figured out the perfect way to capitalize on the skills that they honed in their years on the show. They’ve launched RiffTrax, a site that sells MST3K-style audio commentary tracks to modern movies for three bucks a pop. Justina and I tried their commentary for The Matrix tonight, and I’m happy to report that it was fully up to snuff. In fact, it was good enough to make me willing to rent some of the other movies that they’ve riffed on. (Fortunately, they’ve provided a sample video clip for each movie that they’ve covered.)

The strength of their approach is that you’re buying a vanilla MP3, which means it works with everything, and which allows them to lampoon any movie they want without rights hassles. The downside is that you have to sync up the movie and the soundtrack yourself, Wizard of Oz/Dark Side of the Moon style. Fortunately, they’ve worked hard to make this easy—they tell you exactly when to start playing the commentary track. They also have a “robot” that exactly mimics the on-screen dialogue every once in a while, so that you can verify that you’re still in sync. Finally, the commentary track (at least the one we bought) comes with text file telling you where in the commentary each DVD chapter starts, in case you want to pick up from the middle.

All in all, I’m overjoyed to be able to hear the guys back doing what they do best, for movies that we know and love (to hate), without having to wade through any of the skits that were getting increasingly grating in MST3K’s final days. Here’s hoping that it proves to be a rewarding business model for them!

Incidentally, the guys will be performing a live riff of a movie during the San Francisco Sketchfest next month—and we’ll be there!

12/24/2006

We Share Our Mother’s Health

Filed under: — Joe @ 12:54 am

OK, I admit that I’ve been a bit behind the curve on The Knife. They’re one of those bands that I hear name-checked all over the place before I finally realize how awesome they are. I came across this video while going through Pitchfork’s top 100 list, and its stark animation and psychotic synth-pop sound immediately grabbed my attention. Like War Photographer, it’s the perfect visualization for its song. “Enjoy”:


Watch the video

Incidentally, watching YouTube on TV is the killer app for the Wii’s new web browser.

12/21/2006

Photos and a Surprising Fact

Filed under: — Nick @ 12:54 pm

I’m gonna start posting photos at:
www.fox-gieg.com/photos

And did you know that Ben Kingsley’s real name is Krishna Banji, and he’s Jewish? I guess the pre-IMDB criticisms of his ethnic authenticity in both Gandhi and Schindler’s List are hopelessly obsolete.

12/15/2006

Happy Hanukkah (and that settles it!)

Filed under: — Nick @ 3:43 am

I did a little linguistic research this afternoon–isn’t counting Google hits the best way to answer usage questions?

Hanukkah: 16,900,000
Chanukah: 3,930,000
Hanukah: 1,110,000
Hanuka: 639,000
Chanuka: 596,000
Channukah: 535,000
Chanukkah: 340,000
Hanukka: 124,000
Chanike: 958
Khanike: 882
Chanikke: 4

Oh, and while we’re at it…
Kabbalah: 3,830,000
Kabala: 1,250,000
Kabbala: 997,000
Qabalah: 276,000
Kaballah: 203,000
Kabalah: 147,000
Qabala: 123,000
Qabbalah: 80,600
Kaballa: 50,100
Kabballah: 36,800
Qaballah: 18,400
Qabbala: 16,700
Qabballah: 964
Qaballa: 869
Kabballa: 630
Qabballa: 563

All I want for Hanukkah is for the Academy of the Hebrew Language in Israel to invent us a pinyin already. (I mean, if they’re going to rub out the nonstandard dialect of my ancestors, they might at least improve my search results.)

Powered by WordPress